A lesson learned from THE ROMANS: A 2,000 YEAR HISTORY, by Edward Watts
Change and evolution are vital for the long-term survival of a state. While my primary interest and specialty has always been American History, it has always been a fun hobby to read up on ancient civilizations, particularly Egypt and Rome. People have spent centuries trying to study the lessons of the Roman Empire, and unsurprisingly that has meant centuries of different interpretations and arguments over how Rome became such a successful and long-lasting civilization, and that includes arguments as to when exactly Rome "rose" and "fell." In his new book The Romans: A 2,000 Year History , author Edward Watts takes the controversial stance that "Rome" as a unique civilization actually lasted all the way through the first sack of the city of Constantinople in 1205 (other historians call the Constantinople-led Roman outbranch "Byzantium" and argue it's its own unique civilization, I don't know nearly enough about that debate to render...